On April 7th, ASAFAS held the entrance ceremony for incoming graduate students
for the new academic year. This event did not in any way influence the scheduling
of our monthly meeting, yet it so happened that this month’s Executive
Committee Meeting was held one week earlier than usual, on the 8th, the day
following the ceremony. Starting this month, two newly appointed research
associates of ASAFAS joined the Executive Committee. Also, the administrative
assistant in charge of the website attended the Meeting, as we felt her attendance
would be beneficial for the discussion of the impending mid-term evaluation
hearing, which will be mentioned later.
The report items began with an explanation of the final status of the execution
of the FY2003 budget. It was reported that the budget execution has been
completed with no lending or borrowing between divisions or sections. We would like to thank the accounting staff
for all their hard work. There was also an explanation from the Research
Promotion Section on the basic policy regarding the use of a total of 1.6
million yen in budget for promoting the seminars, both domestic and overseas.
The chair of the working group of the graduate student workshop gave an
update on further progress. As reported in last month’s What’s
New from the Secretariat, it was decided that the Working Group would be
run at the initiative of young faculty members and graduate students. At
this month’s meeting, it was pointed out that the title Working Group
doesn’t adequately convey the active involvement of graduate students
in the planning and management of the workshop, and so a proposal was made
to rename it the “Workshop Organizing Committee.” This was approved.
Next, there were two agenda items. First, the Network Section, citing the
need for managing and updating the website, proposed adding one more administrative
assistant, and after discussion, approval was given for this move. Considering
that our Program emphasizes the website as almost the sole medium for disseminating
information on our Program’s activities, the conclusion was that this
is something that had to be done. It was decided that the Secretariat
reserve fund would be used for our share of the expenses.
Also in connection with the website, data presented by the COE leader showed
that access to our website is skyrocketing. Following the installation of
a counter on May 26th, 2003, we reached 5,000 hits on October 26th, 2003,
10,000 hits on January 6th, 2004, 15,000 hits on February 20th, 2004, and
20,000 hits
on April 7th, 2004. In other words, what began as an average of 33 hits a
day has become an average of more than 100 a day since the beginning of this
year. Numbers are not everything, but these were very encouraging figures
for the members of the Executive Committee.
The most important agenda item this month was the hearing for the mid-term
evaluation. It was reported that the hearing for our Program will be held
in the afternoon of May 18th in Tokyo, and there were discussions on how
to prepare for it. Each program will be given a 30-minute hearing, comprising
a 10-minute presentation by the leader, followed by a 15-minute question
and answer session, with the remaining 5 minutes used by the evaluation committee
for its deliberations. The Secretariat’s proposal was for the meeting
to be attended by the COE leader, the new dean of ASAFAS, and the director
of CSEAS. This plan was approved.
At the Meeting, the leader distributed the outline of the presentation to
be made at the hearing as well as a list of materials to be readied for it,
and a lively exchange of opinion was held based on these documents. At times
like this, one can say that two heads (or twenty-one heads in our case) are
decidedly better than one. From now on, plans are for the COE leader to draw
up the mandatory presentation documents based on the ideas discussed at the
Meeting, and to submit these on May 10th to the University’s Administration
Bureau. In addition, the leader and the Secretariat will compile other supplementary
presentation documents, also based on the ideas discussed at the Meeting,
to distribute at the hearing. It seems the most sensible thing to do now
is to make our best efforts, and to cross our fingers.
In relation to the compilation of supplementary presentation documents for
the hearing, there was also a discussion regarding the International Workshop
to be held during the last year of the Program. It is scheduled to be held
in November 2006 in Kyoto, as an international symposium, to which we will
invite scholars from Japan and abroad for presentations. With regards to
the contents, the head of the Research Promotion Section voiced the opinion
that since the symposium will be a forum for presenting the fruits of the
COE Program and 2006 will also be the year before the tenth anniversary of
ASAFAS, it should be a forum for discussion on the frontiers of area studies,
or a place to talk about “the current state and future dreams of area
studies.” More detailed contents of the symposium will be considered
within this month by the Research Promotion Section.
Partly because this month is the first of the new fiscal year, there were
few agenda items and reports. We anticipated finishing earlier than the allotted
two hours, but contrary to these expectations, the Meeting actually went
ten minutes over. This shows how lively the discussions were on the hearing
for the mid-term evaluation and the international symposium to be held in
the last year of the Program.
(Kato)
|